Saturday 22 March 2008

A Good Smacked Bottom

When I was small, the Ultimate Deterrent was always the threat of a good smacked bottom. I fully understood that when my mother threatened to give me one of these, she wasn't proposing to get this item from a box on top of the wardrobe and present it to me with a ribbon round it - no, her goal was a goodness modification to my own small backside. And when threatened with this, I knew very well that the Clog Brandishing Lady was not amenable to reason, and that those stairs that I had to get up by the count of ten to evade the translation of my bottom to the realms of virtue had to be got up now. I argued, as any child will do, until she had reached six, but then I ran like hell, because my mother didn't mean half way up the stairs where she could still see and hear me, she meant in my room with the door shut. And reader, she did mean it.

I don't know where she got that phrase - a good smacked bottom - for it seems unlikely that my bottom would imbued with goodness by a smack, and anyway, it was not generally my bottom with which my mother had the issue. In the confederacy of my small Krenzly bod, my bottom was the sufferer for the sins of my mouth or my stroppy flouncing about which broke stuff. As I grew older, it also occurred to me that my mother was modelling some very poor grammar, as what she really proposed was not a good smacked bottom at all, but a well smacked bottom - something like a well tempered Klavier.

I did not like to be hit, but I retained no lasting emotional scars from the "good smacked bottom" run-ins, partly because I got the fuck out of the way. I did not like men or boys to be too close to me, and I ascribe this partly to the fact that - unlike my mother - my brother and my father did not deal in threat or warning, they just hauled off and whacked you round the chops or in the belly and that was that. I learnt to get the fuck out of the way of them as well, but a damn sight sooner - ie I avoided them altogether.

At school, I was never threatened with any form of violence by those in authority over me. I got into plenty of fights with boys larger and more violent than myself, but bar the loss of my front teeth, I got by outside my house just fine. And also bar the eternal naughtiness in Year 8 maths - when I used to take yo-yos and rubber balls to school to occupy myself during my inevitable exclusion from class - and a notable occasion when I sat muttering swear words at my teacher whenever he approached me for a lesson - I survived seven years at secondary school without running into trouble for my poor attitude.

The reason I mention this is that my attitude was poor. I was a very self-conscious rebel - without a clue how to show my full rebelliousness, but also without much of the required backbone. I was arsy and full of myself and had a lot of aggression going nowhere, but I did not usually spend my time in school in trouble. My parents meant business. I skived, I loafed, I calculated the exact amount of laziness I could carry off without trouble - and I was quiet in lessons, wrote essays and copied up experiments and learned distressingly difficult valents, equations and mathematical theories without a bleat. My parents never made me. I was famous in my circle for the fact that my parents did not ever organise me or ask about my homework. But I knew very well - and so did my siblings - that my parents meant business.

Teachers at my school were almost never ill. The school was selective and children were streamed or set and did their work. When we were in year nine, two boys were caught with drugs on the school premises. We never saw them again. My school meant business.

I hated school. I felt - rightly or wrongly - that nobody there gave a shit about me or my fellow students. We worked a lot out of books, and I never saw a four part lesson in my life. Most of the extra curricular activities were netball, at which I sucked. But I was given books - one between two - and quiet - lessons of total silence to write or complete maths problems in - and I for this I am still grateful.

Whether any of this means anything in terms of education and achievement I can't tell. I know that teachers now are perpetually ill - and I ascribe this to the horrible behaviour they are expected to countenance. I know that children constantly complain of headaches towards the end of the day, particularly if the class grow noisy. Sometimes they ask for "a quiet lesson" - reading or writing or drawing in "silence" (meaning they whisper).

Children don't like being smacked, and it seems pretty nasty to bully somebody smaller than yourself. However, if you don't teach children how to behave, they won't know. Some parents encourage their children to be disrespectful to teachers. Such people should home-school their kids, with books lovingly paid for by the state. Few parents smack their kids without some shame nowadays, though at the end of three years of 24/7 parenting, parents turn out to be human, and so it still goes on. And I doubt if it does them any harm. Plenty of things harmed me but I got over the smacked bottoms - or threat thereof - just fine. Think on.

1 comment:

Peter Jameson said...

We all have different attitudes and opinions based on so many factors. I agree that the word good is inappropriate and should be changed to well, but for me who made such a threat depended on who gave it. i would have the same attitude to you when facing a strong sadist or someone enjoyed humiliating or some kind of torture to control behaviour. Yet the threat of a well smacked bottom from someone I respected for their attitude to improve, help everyone to achieve or learn new things to me is merely an exciting dare and a challenge for me to work out the attitudes and behaviour of both parties together. Is that attitude very strange to you?